A Jim Loehr course I sat in for last year talked about how champions, by their very definitions, were abnormalities. What made a champion a champion, was because his/her innate reaction towards obstacles and difficulty were intrinsically different.
In other words, champions don't act, react, behave or think like normal people.
Take Federer versus the lay man on court, in a 4-5 down, advantage in situation. The serve opens, the rally starts. He hits the first ball deep, aggressively. His second ball shoots past the net---clipping the lines accurately, pushing his opponent deeper into the back of the court. Too soon, his opponent starts struggling with the rabbit race to and fro---and inevitably he gives that weak half-assed lob in response. The lay man sees the opportunity---shuffles quickly to the front, pointing his free hand at the dropping ball as he poises his racquet arm elegantly.
"Ha! I've got him!"
And just as he lets his arm sail, he inevitably hits that easy smash into the net. Into the net. Instead of his, the fist pumping, adrenaline-rushing "VAMOSS!!" goes triumphantly to his opponent.
Now, the layman, being the lay man he is, would scream at himself. Maybe his arms start flailing around like flaming limbs dipped in kerosene. His face might be contorted into a Van-Gogh howl. Or at best, the more elegant of the lays slouches over, drops his head and shakes it disconsolately.
Federer, however, as we have seen in so many occasions, behaves differently. The only thing that drops are his eyes. His body does a quick swivel around while his fingers hold onto his grip not to smash it---but to simply twirl it in his hands. It's almost as if he twirls the error out of the fabric of his mind too. Drop it. Moves on.
Maybe champion tennis players, or just champions in general, are really palimpsest experts in disguise...
